Demo -- read-only snapshot of the live system as of 2026-07-16T01:45:31Z; no live data, paper units only.
Skip to main content

evidence / Frontier measurements

A Deeply Analytical System -- The Recorded-Analytics Inventory

Every number below is copied verbatim from a JSON artifact written by a showcase module that ran once against local data on disk, or from an existing catalog entry. Nothing here is re-derived from memory. The single truth-source for any figure is docs/JOB_EVIDENCE_PACKET.md. The product is a calibrated predictor, not an edge product -- an honest REJECT or null is a success, and where a live market matches or beats us that is stated plainly.

strongest single receipt

"Deeply analytical" is easy to assert and hard to prove

the claim

"Deeply analytical" is easy to assert and hard to prove. So this page does not assert it -- it inventories it. There are 23 self-contained analytics modules under scripts/platformkit/analytics_showcase/, each of which runs once, reads real artifacts, writes a provenance-stamped JSON to out/, and renders a chart to docs/img/. Every one is catalogued with its artifact path and its honest caveat in docs/ANALYTICS_CATALOG.md. Below are four that speak to depth directly: the scale of the claims corpus, the raw pitch-level base the MLB metrics sit on, a market-microstructure measurement, and the answer engine's own coverage record. Each one is built so you can re-run it and get the same number. That is the only superlative this page will make: this is the most transparent version you can audit -- not the best in the world, the one whose every number you can trace to a file yourself.


cited artifacts

committed artifact
scripts/platformkit/analytics_showcase/out/claims_corpus_meta.json
scripts/platformkit/analytics_showcase/out/statcast_showcase.json
scripts/platformkit/analytics_showcase/out/tick_microstructure.json
scripts/platformkit/analytics_showcase/out/qa_coverage_stats.json
Claims corpus, generated vs validated sample, top families
Statcast 2025 pitch-type mix and velocity spread
Market-microstructure cadence and spread measurement
QA regression bank and coverage-stress record

why this matters

Depth in a forecasting system is usually asserted through a headline metric. This system inventories it instead: 23 recorded analytics, a six-figure claims corpus with generated and validated volumes reported as separate numbers, a 693,037-pitch base under the MLB metrics, a microstructure measurement that discloses its own thinness, and an answer engine whose coverage number is honest because it refuses on purpose. Every one is a JSON file you can open and a module you can re-run. The full index with per-analytic caveats is docs/ANALYTICS_CATALOG.md. None of these four is a new proof, and each says so in its own output. The transferable thing is not any single number -- it is that the whole inventory is built to be audited row by row, each label written so a reader cannot come away with a rosier number than the file supports.


no edge claimed

This site reports calibration and sharpness only, never a dollar edge, ROI, or bankroll result. An honest null is a success.