behind
balls > strikes (pitcher behind; hitter's count)
- Class n
- 183,042
- Pitch-type n
- 181,462
MLB / Descriptive count context
Explore pitch selection and recorded outcomes by the balls and strikes before a pitch. Compare individual counts, then inspect broader count classes in the published local 2025 Statcast snapshot.
Exact count view
Local 2025 Statcast pull. Snapshot . 12 of 12 counts available.
Choose the balls-strikes count before a pitch. Each cell shows the selected published measurement; a count cohort is not a rate denominator.
Strikes before pitch
Selected count
Even count. Balls and strikes are the count before this pitch.
0-0: 55.03%; 0-0: 55.03%; signed difference: +0.00 pp.
Descriptive comparison only. It applies no weighting or statistical inference.The source does not publish pitch-type, coded-strike, or in-zone rate denominators for exact counts. n is the count cohort size only; it is not used as a rate denominator. Coded strikes are Statcast type S (called, swinging, and foul strikes), not whiffs.
| Count | Class | n | Top pitch | Top share | In zone | Coded strikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Even | 178,407 | FF | 32.77% | 55.03% | 50.38% |
| 0-1 | Pitcher ahead | 89,820 | FF | 28.24% | 46.04% | 42.31% |
| 0-2 | Pitcher ahead | 46,656 | FF | 31.77% | 32.41% | 36.03% |
| 1-0 | Pitcher behind | 67,516 | FF | 31.04% | 56.26% | 49.90% |
| 1-1 | Even | 69,473 | FF | 27.95% | 51.16% | 45.42% |
| 1-2 | Pitcher ahead | 67,807 | FF | 30.51% | 38.41% | 40.69% |
| 2-0 | Pitcher behind | 23,053 | FF | 37.59% | 60.17% | 51.69% |
| 2-1 | Pitcher behind | 35,667 | FF | 31.17% | 57.87% | 48.27% |
| 2-2 | Even | 57,832 | FF | 30.81% | 47.57% | 44.93% |
| 3-0 | Pitcher behind | 7,457 | FF | 65.12% | 62.93% | 57.23% |
| 3-1 | Pitcher behind | 14,543 | FF | 42.50% | 62.84% | 50.04% |
| 3-2 | Pitcher behind | 34,806 | FF | 37.06% | 59.94% | 48.27% |
These grouped views publish separate rate denominators. Their overlapping samples cannot be added to the partition.
behind: balls > strikes (pitcher behind; hitter's count)
Selected class
| Pitch type | Pitch count | Published frequency |
|---|---|---|
| FF | 63,970 | 35.25% |
| SI | 34,992 | 19.28% |
| SL | 23,846 | 13.14% |
| FC | 16,880 | 9.30% |
| CH | 16,350 | 9.01% |
| ST | 9,851 | 5.43% |
| CU | 7,850 | 4.33% |
| FS | 4,126 | 2.27% |
| KC | 2,146 | 1.18% |
| SV | 622 | 0.34% |
| Unpublished remainder | Not published | 0.47% |
Pitch frequency records the class-wide mix. The unpublished remainder is 100% minus the sum of the rounded published frequencies. For conditional next-pitch probability after a prior pitch, use the behind sequencing view.
Across all classes
Coded strikes are type == S; they are not a swinging-strike measurement. Each type outcome uses n_type, while in-zone rate uses n_zone.
| Class | Coded strike rate, not swinging strike rate (n_type) | Ball rate (n_type) | In-play rate (n_type) | In-zone rate (n_zone) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| behind | 49.81% n 183,042 | 30.65% n 183,042 | 19.54% n 183,042 | 58.55% n 181,462 |
| even | 48.22% n 305,712 | 35.97% n 305,712 | 15.81% n 305,712 | 52.74% n 304,924 |
| ahead | 40.34% n 204,283 | 41.32% n 204,283 | 18.34% n 204,283 | 40.39% n 204,107 |
| two_strike | 42.10% n 207,101 | 35.84% n 207,101 | 22.06% n 207,101 | 43.24% n 206,876 |
| three_ball | 49.90% n 56,806 | 26.43% n 56,806 | 23.67% n 56,806 | 61.06% n 56,216 |
Count-class structure
balls > strikes (pitcher behind; hitter's count)
balls == strikes
strikes > balls (pitcher ahead)
strikes == 2 (putaway lens -- OVERLAPS the partition)
Overlapping view; it is not additive with the partition.
balls == 3 (must-throw-strike lens -- OVERLAPS the partition)
Overlapping view; it is not additive with the partition.
Source fields: mlb_count_leverage.json -> by_leverage_class[].n, pitch_type_n, pitch_mix_top, and outcome_proxies.
Reading trail
Read first: Read the count-state cards before comparing pitch mixes across leverage classes.
Next question: Which previous pitch changes the next-pitch probability inside a count class?
Read the analysis: Pitch velocity shape: what the distribution says, and what it does not