Skip to main content
Read-only snapshot: model data as of 2026-07-16; paper desk record through 2026-10-22. No live data; paper units only.
CourtVision
Ask Scout
Browse › Absolute forecast error by game state
Analytics module · Source as of 2026-09-16

Absolute forecast error by game state

Recorded absolute residual volume is largest in MLB early(inn1-3) at a .4-.6 model probability: 2812.37 total_abs_residual_mass, with mean_abs_residual 0.4888 across 5,754 rows. This describes published residual volume, not reducible miscalibration.

View full size

Data integrity

These MLB/soccer numbers are revision 2, computed on the segment-clean corpus (2026-09-16). Revision 1 values are withdrawn and kept in the regeneration receipt. Segmentation excluded 51,635 of the 78,986 MLB ticks (65.4 percent); the specifically identified label mismatches were a smaller 27,076 (34.3 percent).

  • residual_anatomy
Read the full finding
confirmednull (a finding)not testabledescriptivepending
Residual Anatomy
Residual Anatomy chart
scripts/platformkit/analytics_showcase/out/residual_anatomy.jsonSource as of 2026-09-16n not published

How to read this figure

Each segment reports n rows, mean absolute residual, and total_abs_residual_mass (n times mean); the ranked list puts the biggest total error slices first.

Published coverage

The committed artifact is partial; only its published coverage is shown here.

PopulationStatusGamesUsable bucketsPublished reason
MLBunknown---
SOCCER_INTLunknown---

What it means

Ranking every sport x game-state x probability-band segment by total absolute error shows the improvement backlog is concentrated where little has happened and the outcome is genuinely uncertain -- early, near-50/50 states. That is where fixing the model would remove the most cumulative error.

Caveats and confounds

No significance test here; total residual mass scales with row count, so high-volume buckets rank high partly by size, not only by per-row error. Segmentation removed about two thirds of the MLB ticks, so every mass figure is smaller than the revision-1 reading without the per-row error having moved much.