Descriptive only — these are measured surface win rates, not projections.
Tennis players · Tennis · as of 2026-07-19
Alexander Zverev (ATP)
Historical measurements from this snapshot.
ATP surface windows: source corpus documented as 2015-2025; career uses all dated corpus matches, while recent starts 2023-01-01 and overlaps the corpus. Published floors apply independently for each metric and window. Exact player match counts and latest match dates are not published. The as-of date records claim computation, not a match cutoff.
- Clay minus hard-court win rate, career
- 5.6 ppPercentile rank 67 among 184 measured profilespct 67 of 184 measured
- Clay minus hard-court win rate, recent
- 6.0 ppPercentile rank 63 among 69 measured profilespct 63 of 69 measured
- Clay-court win rate, career
- 74.7%Percentile rank 98 among 190 measured profilespct 98 of 190 measured
- Clay-court win rate, recent
- 75.3%Percentile rank 94 among 72 measured profilespct 94 of 72 measured
- Grass minus overall win rate, career
- -4.3 ppPercentile rank 26 among 153 measured profilespct 26 of 153 measured
- Grass minus overall win rate, recent
- -0.5 ppPercentile rank 24 among 44 measured profilespct 24 of 44 measured
- Grass-court win rate, career
- 66.2%Percentile rank 82 among 68 measured profilespct 82 of 68 measured
- Hard-court win rate, career
- 69.1%Percentile rank 97 among 251 measured profilespct 97 of 251 measured
- Hard-court win rate, recent
- 69.3%Percentile rank 94 among 113 measured profilespct 94 of 113 measured
1 of 10 expected measurements not published: Grass-court win rate, recent.
Stored percentiles rank measured rows in this published pack; higher is only higher, not a quality judgement.
What stands out
- Remarkably steady career-to-recent: clay 0.7466/0.7531 and hard 0.6906/0.6933.
- Clay tops hard in both windows (clay_minus_hard_career +0.056, clay_minus_hard_recent +0.0598).
- Grass is the softest of the three surfaces (grass_wr_career 0.6618).
Reading note
Descriptive career and recent-form surface win rates as of the corpus end, not a prediction and not a causal claim. Per-surface floors apply (n>=30 career, independent floors for recent form); below-floor metrics show n/a, and nothing here adjusts for era, opponent quality, or draw.